Tatiana

Chest bone

Thumbnail: Three quarter body
Thumbnail: Bust
Thumbnail: Legs
Thumbnail: Hand
Thumbnail: Torso

Lying down

Some por­traits of Tatiana. As a per­son into voyeurism (more specif­i­cal­ly, on the end being observed), she’s more com­fort­able with her clothes off than on. I love work­ing with peo­ple who are com­fort­able with their bod­ies. You get total cre­ative free­dom, instead of the frus­tra­tion of hav­ing to walk on eggshells, lest you offend a mod­el’s sen­si­bil­i­ties.

I’ve dis­cov­ered that when doing nude pho­tog­ra­phy, you need to open up the aper­ture so that a greater por­tion of the per­son is in focus than in con­ven­tion­al por­traits. If you focus on only the eyes, you lose the nudi­ty and it becomes a dis­trac­tion. If you focus on naked­ness, you lose the eyes and it becomes vul­gar.

21 comments

  1. A good pho­tog­ra­ph­er like Jeff makes an already love­ly young woman even more appeal­ing to the eye. Now I have some­thing to give thanks for on Thanksgiving Day as you’ve put a twin­kle in an old bear’s eye.

    • I’ve always believed that beau­ty comes from more of the mod­el than the pho­tog­ra­ph­er. When cap­tur­ing a less-than-attrac­tive per­son, there isn’t much a pho­tog­ra­ph­er can do to make them look bet­ter. Although, there are a few angles that may be a touch more flat­ter­ing (I’m remind­ed of the Seinfeld episode where his attrac­tive girl­friend walks around naked, but los­es all appeal when cough­ing or open­ing a jar of pick­les).

  2. Not!Work!Safe! (yipes, give us a warn­ing next time‑I know it’s just por­trai­ture with which I’m per­fect­ly com­fort­able but peo­ple I’m around would have a com­plete cow.)

    Beautiful of course. But then you always find the beau­ti­ful ones. Not sur­pris­ing.

    • Sorry, it was Thanksgiving week­end in Canada, so I thought most peo­ple would be at home.

      And of course she’s beau­ti­ful. I only take pic­tures of beau­ti­ful peo­ple. :)

      • Yup, not in the won­der­ful land of snow. Darn.

  3. Bless you heart Jeff…bless your heart.

    • I expect hugs the next time I see you.

  4. Wow, these are stun­ning pho­tos … so much detail.

    I’d love to have ones like this done of me one day — kind of a record of the body before time and aging gets the bet­ter of it.

    • There have been a few women past their prime who’ve told me they wish they had pho­tos of when they were younger, so they could remem­ber when they once looked fresh and nubile.

      I think the same thing applies to preg­nan­cy pho­tos. You don’t get to expe­ri­ence some­thing like that too many times in your life. It’s nice to have a record of such times or changes.

      • Yes, preg­nan­cy pho­tos a la Demi Moore?

        It would be a shame not to have pho­tos tak­en at some point soon … before every­thing starts migrat­ing south for an extend­ed win­ter :(

        I’d also want to have my pre­g­na­cy (when and if it hap­pens) caught on film as well … so hap­py to know some­one so tal­ent­ed to help with these things (ahem … Jeff). :)

      • Actually, I was think­ing more like PREGASAURUS!

        As for the film­ing the preg­nan­cy, I hope you mean the birth, and not the con­cep­tion! :D (Or do I?)

      • Ahh — I am old school. To me — film can mean video, or as I meant it in this case film as in film pho­tog­ra­phy. (So old school!). :)

        To be hon­est … I think it is strange that women (like me) who would nev­er in a mil­lion years be com­fort­able with video doc­u­men­tary of their vagi­nas (under any cir­cum­stances — in its nor­mal and or aroused state) be com­fort­able with a doc­u­ment of a giant baby head com­ing out of said vagi­na!

        But that’s just me — does­n’t make sense. :)

        Just saw the Pregasaurus pho­tos — she is beau­ti­ful … and actu­al­ly quite tiny framed with a beau­ti­ful big bel­ly!

      • I total­ly under­stand what you mean about being com­fort­able when naked dur­ing preg­nan­cy. That makes total sense to me. It’s the same way it’s accept­ed to show baby butts in dia­per com­mer­cials or Anne Geddes prints, but as soon as a child hit a cer­tain age, it sud­den­ly becomes inap­pro­pri­ate. It’s our own bias that soci­ety puts on these things that makes them taint­ed, and it’s hard to see bod­ies as any­thing but sex­u­al with that bias. Luckily, preg­nan­cy remains a sacred, beau­ti­ful thing to peo­ple like you and me.

      • Don’t get me ooohing and ahh­hing about cute naked baby butts! My clock is tick­ing loud enough already! (don’t tell Mark … he might go run­ning lol).

  5. god damn WHAT EARINGS !!

    • Those ear­rings on her breasts of course!

  6. I appre­ci­ate the pho­tog­ra­phy, but a lot of peo­ple read your site at work. You might want to con­sid­er adding a “Read more” and warn­ing peo­ple before they click it that it con­tains nudi­ty ;)

    • I did­n’t real­ize how many peo­ple read my site at work! I’ll put the nudi­ty behind the cut next time.

  7. Jeffrey did­n’t think ahead far enough in terms of the inter­net habits of his loy­al read­ers. In his defense, it’s not very pro­fes­sion­al to be a “all a twit­ter” or read blogs at work and some employ­ers get right crab­by if they catch you doing so. It’s also worth remem­ber­ing that some employ­ers keep tabs on what is being viewed on com­pa­ny equip­ment through spy­ware… so best not to risk being rep­ri­mand­ed — or worse — for the sake of a vir­tu­al boo­bie or two, no mat­ter how well pho­tographed it/they may be.

    • They way I fig­ure it — if the site isn’t blocked by the com­pa­ny web manager(s) …then every­thing is fair game!

      Besides — if the com­pa­ny and tech staff have so much time on their hands that they have the resources to ‘spy’ on employ­ees inter­net brous­ing hab­bits (every­one needs a men­tal break once in a while) — then that is a com­pa­ny I am sure a lot of peo­ple would pre­fer not to work for.

      Word. :)

  8. Hmm, just won­der­ing what kind of a facial expres­sion should a nude mod­el put on.

Leave a Reply