Knowing where the trap is — that’s the first step in evading it. This is like single combat, Son, only on a larger scale — a feint within a feint within a feint…seemingly without end. The task is to unravel it.
—Duke Leto Atreides, Dune
A feint can be used as a test, to gather information, or a trap, to get someone to do what you want them to do, or both.
The most important part to understand is that the opponent is inherently involved in the situation. You can only gain advantage from a feint depending on the way he or she (re)acts.
A savvy person will react with exactly the right amount of effort, especially important because a feint is only a mock attack. In Tai Chi terms, they balance an opponent’s yin (expansion) with yang (compression), and vice-versa1. In Taoist terms, they act like a mirror, reflecting only that which is in front of them, nothing more and nothing less. With a savvy person, the feint fails, and nothing is gained.
An ignorant person will fall for the trick. They overreact and unbalance themselves2, exposing their vulnerabilities. Without understanding true intention, without seeing the big picture, they get played like a sucker.
And the more they react, the more ridiculous they look.
Hi! visit your comments from May 24, 2005. Thanks
If only I were smart enough, I could’ve incorporated these into my latest (bad story).
It’ll be posted tomorrow. I play Zelda: Wind Waker tonight instead!
Is that first comment some kind of weird spam or something? You have no post on May 24, 2005…
@Kali — Hi! I replied on my comments from May 24, 2005. Thanks.
@Maeko — Wow, I haven’t played Wind Waker in a long time. I should pull that one out again. I’m sure I’d appreciate it even more now. Unfortunately, I think it would make me want to buy a Wii + Twilight Princess even more.
@trolley — He/she was referring to my post on the 29th of May that year about the May 24 camping trip. I’ve been getting some really weird comment spam lately though. Spam that doesn’t link to anything, or doesn’t say anything, or uses rel=“nofollow” tags in the links. And check this comment out. What the hell?
I think it’s an attempt to train spam filters to allow certain comments, then once the filter’s guard is down the spamming will begin again. That’s just my theory though.
I read somewhere that seemingly innocuous comments are made so that the blog owners will leave them up, and spam robots can search for these comments to see which ones haven’t been filtered. That way, they’ll get an idea of which ones are still around, opening the door for more spam.