<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tao Character</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equivocality.com/2009/06/11/the-tao-character/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/06/11/the-tao-character/</link>
	<description>To be equivocal is to truly live.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/06/11/the-tao-character/#comment-48114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=4684#comment-48114</guid>
		<description>It makes you wonder: did the word come first, or the idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes you wonder: did the word come first, or the idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/06/11/the-tao-character/#comment-48113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=4684#comment-48113</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s usually 12 strokes I think (the last and second-last strokes are usually combined, but for some reason it&#039;s sometimes split). Lots of Chinese writing follows rules of which strokes and direction to write, so I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if you knew how to write it just by looking at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it’s usually 12 strokes I think (the last and second-last strokes are usually combined, but for some reason it’s sometimes split). Lots of Chinese writing follows rules of which strokes and direction to write, so I wouldn’t be surprised if you knew how to write it just by looking at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jin</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/06/11/the-tao-character/#comment-47987</link>
		<dc:creator>Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=4684#comment-47987</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s such a beautiful character. It&#039;s structured while fluid. Like the Tao itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s such a beautiful character. It’s structured while fluid. Like the Tao itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xibee</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/06/11/the-tao-character/#comment-47969</link>
		<dc:creator>Xibee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=4684#comment-47969</guid>
		<description>Neat.  I looked at it with an eye to which strokes come in what order, pretty interesting.  13 strokes at least!  I think I could write it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat.  I looked at it with an eye to which strokes come in what order, pretty interesting.  13 strokes at least!  I think I could write it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

