(Mis) Understanding Therapy

Occasionally, con­ver­sa­tions around the din­ner table turn to psy­chother­a­py — some­one knows a co-work­er, or a friend, or a rel­a­tive who sees a shrink — and my fam­i­ly would talk about it so dis­parag­ing­ly.

They’d say there’s some­thing wrong with peo­ple who go to ther­a­py; not the fact that they have men­tal health issues, but the fact that any­one who needs to pay some­one else to feel bet­ter is fool­ish. They think psy­chol­o­gists are bad, or of no use. That you only need to go to ther­a­py if you don’t know how to “find a hob­by” or “blow off steam”, or don’t have any friends to talk to. Their ideas about it are so naïve, sim­plis­tic, and stereo­typ­i­cal; a per­fect reflec­tion of their minds and the way they see the world.

I’d always stay qui­et. How could I explain the dam­age done, when it was some of them who dam­aged me in the first place?

But when the con­ver­sa­tion turned to me, I men­tioned that I had a ther­a­pist. Perhaps to change their minds about it, to defend some­thing that has helped me so much. After all, I might not even be here talk­ing to them if it was­n’t for my ther­a­py.

Now they know.

But they still don’t under­stand.

7 comments

  1. I’m glad you said some­thing. Say more if you dare. They’re real­ly all in the 1950s over there when it comes to any­thing psy­cho­log­i­cal. I had to explain to my friend’s fam­i­ly mem­bers that their for­mer daugh­ter-in-law was bipo­lar and that’s why things did­n’t work out in the mar­riage. They just did­n’t get it. They kept think­ing it was just some­thing she’d get past. They have vir­tu­al­ly no infor­ma­tion on it because the approach to med­i­cine over there is so holis­tic (which is good, but… kind of does­n’t apply there).

    • There isn’t any rea­son to say any more, and I’m not sure if I should have said any­thing in the first place. It’s just too com­plex for them to under­stand.

  2. Good on ya for when asked say­ing you go. It would have been easy to keep head down and bite tongue. You would­n’t even need to argue why or why not. That prac­tice sits as a coun­ter­point to their talk­ing.

    When some­one’s mind took years to get to one idea, the jour­ney to go to anoth­er idea won’t be by trans­porter beam to anoth­er point of view.

    • I don’t even think it took years to get such ideas, it’s just the result of being born into a cul­ture that does­n’t under­stand psy­chol­o­gy, as Xibee says. And that prob­a­bly makes it even hard­er for them to change their opin­ions about it.

      • each per­son is born with­out knowl­edge and encul­tured into ways of think­ing about some­thing accord­ing to the peo­ple they know. the first in-the-flesh gay per­son, oth­er-col­ored-per­son, divorcee, per­son who bucks trend and does non­sense of run­ning for fun, or has fun­ny diet ideas, or what­ev­er is new to some­one’s expe­ri­ence. It takes a while for the weird way to weight an idea to wear off. Exposure to some­one for who it is nor­mal can do that. Whether the momen­tum of the cul­ture norms it or not.

      • Pearl, I can total­ly under­stand your feel­ing that the breach of a new idea needs to hap­pen; but what you run into in Asian cul­ture is that elders par­tic­u­lar­ly don’t accept any­one younger know­ing more than they do. And when you’re a fam­i­ly mem­ber it’s dou­bly dif­fi­cult. I’ve found the only way is to keep liv­ing (rather than say­ing) the idea.

      • I’d have to agree with this assess­ment. Part of the great thing about Chinese cul­ture is the way elders are treat­ed and respect­ed, but some­times, this is too blind, and goes too far.

Leave a Reply