<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missing The Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/</link>
	<description>To be equivocal is to truly live.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-30034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-30034</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very impressive and flattering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s very impressive and flattering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xibee</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29981</link>
		<dc:creator>Xibee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read that four times and I&#039;m still not sure how you mean that.... tell me elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve read that four times and I’m still not sure how you mean that.… tell me elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29977</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29977</guid>
		<description>I did read your archives, way back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read your archives, way back :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29968</guid>
		<description>Missing the self (out of print) is something different entirely. That says a lot more about you than an old writing style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missing the self (out of print) is something different entirely. That says a lot more about you than an old writing style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29967</guid>
		<description>Preciousness to you is purpose to me. If I could lose it, I don&#039;t think I&#039;d miss it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preciousness to you is purpose to me. If I could lose it, I don’t think I’d miss it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29966</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that you could tell how much my writing as changed, because I don&#039;t think many people could. It takes going back through the archives, which not many have done since they span six years of consistent writing.

It&#039;s hard for me to alternate, or to go back to my old writing style. I feel like it&#039;s more rough and incomplete, and hence inferior, even though that&#039;s exactly what makes it interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that you could tell how much my writing as changed, because I don’t think many people could. It takes going back through the archives, which not many have done since they span six years of consistent writing.</p>
<p>It’s hard for me to alternate, or to go back to my old writing style. I feel like it’s more rough and incomplete, and hence inferior, even though that’s exactly what makes it interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29965</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29965</guid>
		<description>You understand &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; what I was saying in this post. I&#039;ve also tried the first-draft approach, but then I just end up thinking a lot and planning out my entry before I start writing anything.

I&#039;ll keep pushing if you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You understand <em>exactly</em> what I was saying in this post. I’ve also tried the first-draft approach, but then I just end up thinking a lot and planning out my entry before I start writing anything.</p>
<p>I’ll keep pushing if you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xibee</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29961</link>
		<dc:creator>Xibee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29961</guid>
		<description>I miss myself terribly. In print and out.
Things began architecturally and have decayed for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss myself terribly. In print and out.<br />
Things began architecturally and have decayed for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearl</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29959</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29959</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t miss my over earnest inner muddles of drama and the Need to Express. The preciousness feels now like a preamble;can finally get down to something without the clutter of Mattering Terribly. 

Seeing you step into the present and saying, wow, that was nice, but transitory and honoring the ephemeral with faith that more will come, that&#039;s a nice development to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t miss my over earnest inner muddles of drama and the Need to Express. The preciousness feels now like a preamble;can finally get down to something without the clutter of Mattering Terribly. </p>
<p>Seeing you step into the present and saying, wow, that was nice, but transitory and honoring the ephemeral with faith that more will come, that’s a nice development to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2009/01/13/missing-the-old/#comment-29958</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=2947#comment-29958</guid>
		<description>I too noticed a difference, but just couldn&#039;t quite put my finger on it.

On the one hand the previous spontaneity created beautiful writing, on the other the way you now write reflects more maturity and rationality in personal development, plus emotional stability. I&#039;m not sure which I think is better, but I sure miss the beautiful writing. Can you alternate ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too noticed a difference, but just couldn’t quite put my finger on it.</p>
<p>On the one hand the previous spontaneity created beautiful writing, on the other the way you now write reflects more maturity and rationality in personal development, plus emotional stability. I’m not sure which I think is better, but I sure miss the beautiful writing. Can you alternate ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

