<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Itch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/</link>
	<description>To be equivocal is to truly live.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26824</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Andrew&lt;/strong&gt; &#8212; I can totally see how an equilibrium would suit many situations, but I find that sites with one extreme or the either are the ones that take my breath away. Otherwise, they don&#039;t stand out nearly as much.

&lt;strong&gt;@Xibee&lt;/strong&gt; &#8212; Stealth functionality is as difficult as stealth style. Many people believe that function forgoes style for the sake of things like accessibility, but just as not making a decision is still a decision, minimalism is still a style in itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Andrew</strong> — I can totally see how an equilibrium would suit many situations, but I find that sites with one extreme or the either are the ones that take my breath away. Otherwise, they don’t stand out nearly as much.</p>
<p><strong>@Xibee</strong> — Stealth functionality is as difficult as stealth style. Many people believe that function forgoes style for the sake of things like accessibility, but just as not making a decision is still a decision, minimalism is still a style in itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xibee</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26816</link>
		<dc:creator>Xibee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26816</guid>
		<description>Function Schmunction.  STYLE STYLE STYLE.  Ok maybe a streamlined, stealth function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Function Schmunction.  STYLE STYLE STYLE.  Ok maybe a streamlined, stealth function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26814</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26814</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Minimalism, while functional and accessible, tends to lack personality. Style — while beautiful and full of character — tends to be biased and stagnant. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know exactly what you mean. I think the highest goal of good design is to reach that equilibrium between style and a clear visual hierarchy. As soon as the former muddies the latter, you&#039;ve erred. 

Not that it hasn&#039;t been said before by far greater minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Minimalism, while functional and accessible, tends to lack personality. Style — while beautiful and full of character — tends to be biased and stagnant. </p></blockquote>
<p>I know exactly what you mean. I think the highest goal of good design is to reach that equilibrium between style and a clear visual hierarchy. As soon as the former muddies the latter, you’ve erred. </p>
<p>Not that it hasn’t been said before by far greater minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26811</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Lucy&lt;/strong&gt; &#8212; I like to think that I redesign myself all the time. Even our bodies go through a cycle and replace the entirety of our cells in seven years. Are we ever really the same person?

&lt;strong&gt;@Michael&lt;/strong&gt; &#8212; I would have thought that Purell would be more of a priority, especially when doing interactive exercises!

&lt;strong&gt;@Maeko&lt;/strong&gt; &#8212; I&#039;m going to take a look right now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Lucy</strong> — I like to think that I redesign myself all the time. Even our bodies go through a cycle and replace the entirety of our cells in seven years. Are we ever really the same person?</p>
<p><strong>@Michael</strong> — I would have thought that Purell would be more of a priority, especially when doing interactive exercises!</p>
<p><strong>@Maeko</strong> — I’m going to take a look right now…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maeko</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26810</link>
		<dc:creator>Maeko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26810</guid>
		<description>Not related to your post...

but I wrote something that I started thinking about after I read one of your posts... Very in the address to one-time/current significant other style you frequently use. I love those posts... Anyway, maybe you&#039;d like the bit of writing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not related to your post…</p>
<p>but I wrote something that I started thinking about after I read one of your posts… Very in the address to one-time/current significant other style you frequently use. I love those posts… Anyway, maybe you’d like the bit of writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26808</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26808</guid>
		<description>Re: Web Design Itch

No scratching in public or at taiji class and try Gold Bond® Powder -- first wash and dry the affected parts and then apply that healing dust liberally!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Web Design Itch</p>
<p>No scratching in public or at taiji class and try Gold Bond® Powder — first wash and dry the affected parts and then apply that healing dust liberally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26806</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26806</guid>
		<description>Do you ever wonder if you could redesign yourself?  Silly I know as no one is supposed to be perfect.....but damn if I don&#039;t wish I could be a little closer to it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you ever wonder if you could redesign yourself?  Silly I know as no one is supposed to be perfect.….but damn if I don’t wish I could be a little closer to it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26803</guid>
		<description>The problem is that I succumb too often, and spend much time redoing things. As long as we&#039;re content with the design we have, there&#039;s no need. So I hope your hiatus doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re changing the beautifully clean design you had last. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that I succumb too often, and spend much time redoing things. As long as we’re content with the design we have, there’s no need. So I hope your hiatus doesn’t mean you’re changing the beautifully clean design you had last. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fathima</title>
		<link>http://equivocality.com/2008/08/11/design-itch/#comment-26799</link>
		<dc:creator>fathima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equivocality.com/?p=1781#comment-26799</guid>
		<description>oh the redesign itch. when it hits, it&#039;s difficult to overcome. sometimes it&#039;s better to just succumb (:

as an aside, thanks for linking Days With My Father. it&#039;s beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh the redesign itch. when it hits, it’s difficult to overcome. sometimes it’s better to just succumb (:</p>
<p>as an aside, thanks for linking Days With My Father. it’s beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

